
Detroit's blistering finish to the regular season has been highly publicized and discussed from media outlets local and national. But how good was it really? And how does this almost "down" season compare with the great and relevant teams of recent years past?
The Red Wings have not only looked like the Red Wings of old in recent weeks, they have looked better. To illustrate, here is a breakdown of Detroit's season into four quarters.
1. First 20 games of season: 10-6-4, 24 points, .500 winning percentage.
2. Next 20 games: 10-8-2, 22, .500
3. Next 21 games: 8-7-6, 22 points, .381
4. Last 21 games (since NHL play resumed from the Olympics break): 16-3-2, 34 points, .762
Detroit just barely managed to earn 100 points for the tenth straight season, but get this--they only had ten less points than last season, which has been the measuring stick for this season all along. This group of Wings accumulated only 13 points less than that great 2007-08 Stanley Cup team, and just 14 less than that Hall of Fame, 2001-02 Stanley Cup team that Mitch Albom referred to as "the best team-ever". Not too "down" of a season in comparison, eh?
This is even more interesting...I was shocked to look back and see this. If you go back to the 1990s, back to the back-to-back Stanley Cup seasons, the Wings earned just one more point in 1997-98 than this season! They earned eight less than in 1996-97! Are you freaking kidding me? That squad was my favorite roster of all time and will no doubt go down in my books as the greatest Red Wings team that I will ever see! I broke down that 96-97 season into quarters too, check this out.
1. 11-7-2 (2 ties), 24 points
2. 9-6-5, 23 points
3. 10-6-5, 25 points
4. 8-7-6, 22 points
A very consistent, if not outstanding season, and very similar to this year in the first 61 games with 72 points then and 68 now. With 94 points, the 1996-97 Wings were the third seed in the Western Conference. With 94 points the 2009-10 Wings would not even make the playoffs!
So, in case you're just tuning in, that final run was huge, and this season has been special!
I hate to call this guy out again, but someone commented on one of my Facebook posts that the Wings are not "relevant" this year. What the guy probably meant is, "The NHL regular season doesn't matter, and if the Wings aren't in the hunt then what's the point in paying attention to hockey?"
I understand this mentality, and I hate it. It reeks of fan entitlement and the Red Wings' band-wagon ride. I also understand that for a lot of people, hockey is a second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth sport. That's fine. But how can anyone living in Michigan say that the Red Wings are irrelevant when the football team goes 2-30 in the past two seasons and gets more coverage and draws more fan attention with an offseason free agency signing? Don't get me wrong! I follow the damn Lions' every move too! Relevance!
Sorry for the digression, but I'm not quite done. I don't normally discuss teams and seasons in which my only frames of reference are statistics and stories, but could this be the most relevant Red Wings regular season since 1983-84 when a rookie by the name of Steve Yzerman revived the "Dead" Wings. I don't know, I can't say, I was only two/three years old during that season. Has this regular season been more relevant than Scotty Bowman's second season in 1995-96? Do you remember what made that season so relevant besides the birth of the Colorado rivalry? Does 62 wins ring a bell. An NHL record jog your memory? Pretty damn relevant, but where was the controversy, the struggle, the adversity to make it so compelling?
The second installment of my Year In Review will be posted soon!
Peace



































